Follow the evidence around AI.

What is publishable today?

No AI-governance records are published yet. R2 contains useful supporting datasets, but a company record, sanctions list or clinical-trial record does not by itself establish an AI incident, ethical breach or model capability.

ClinicalTrials.gov public XML

Import complete. Suitable only where an AI-related study is identified from explicit study fields and linked to its original record.

Companies House and GLEIF

Imports complete. Suitable for resolving an organisation’s legal identity, not judging its conduct.

OFAC

Import failed. The missing list remains visible as a coverage gap; no screening result is presented as complete.

Evidence desks being built

• Policy and regulation: exact instrument, jurisdiction, effective date and official text.
• Research: study design, population, outcome and registry or paper identifier.
• Incidents and investigations: allegation, response, investigation and finding kept as separate states.
• Organisation identity: stable identifiers and relationship evidence, without guilt by name match.

Publication test

1. Can a reader open the primary record?
2. Are event date, publication date and retrieval date distinct?
3. Does the classification describe what the source actually says?
4. Are corrections and contradictory evidence preserved?

Shared catalogue status: checking…